Autopoiesis and how hyper-connectivity is literally bringing the networks to life


When I started writing my book Living Networks in early 2002 I thought that it was important to demonstrate that the concept of ‘living networks’ was not just a metaphor, but a reality: we, together with the networks that connect us, are literally a new life form.

To show this I drew on the literature on autopoiesis, which was proposed as a new way of understanding the nature of life, and wrote a lengthy introduction to the book. My editor, very rightly, thought it was the wrong way to begin the book, and the introduction never saw the light of day.

This morning when someone mentioned living networks to me I remembered that this was a literal phrase that I had never explained, so here is the introduction, seen for the first time. We are indeed part of an emerging higher-order life form, and that is a wonderful thing…

Introduction: How Connectivity is Bringing Our World to Life:

We who are privileged to be alive today are participating in the birth of a new lifeform: the global networks. All the talk of the “new economy” in the late 1990s reflected many of the changes at play in our world. In truth they may well have underestimated the importance of the juncture we are at, which represents a complete change in the nature of society and business. Since the dawn of humanity people have been the dominant force on our planet, for better and—sometimes—for worse. Now people as individuals are being transcended by a higher-order lifeform, which is connecting and merging most of the people and all the digital devices on the planet into a single entity.

In some ways we have been moving towards this point for millenia. Just as amoeba or other single-celled organisms flowed and interacted in the primordial soup long before eventually coming together to form multi-celled organisms, individuals have been developing increasingly rich interaction over the years. The pace has accelerated, and now we are finally reaching the stage at which we must think of ourselves and the networks that connect us as an entity in its own right. This is happening on two levels. First, integrating humanity and the flow of information and ideas so closely it becomes as a single “global brain”. And second, the computing and communication technologies themselves are forming a system with all the characteristics of life. As we shall see, these two concepts overlap strongly, as people and technology increasingly merge.

You might find this idea ridiculous, intriguing, far-fetched, amusing, perhaps all of these. I will argue in this book that once we adjust our understanding of life to the new world that we find ourselves in, that it is simply a fact. However this book is primarily a business book—it is intended for people who are managing organizations, working for themselves or others, trying to make a difference in the world, doing what it takes to achieve success in any domain. I certainly hope that as you read this book you come to believe and understand that we are living within networks that are themselves living. That isn’t important, however—in any case you will see how it is useful to think of the networks as being alive, and the very practical business implications of a world in which information and ideas are flowing vastly faster, more broadly, and more richly than ever before. As such it is an examination of the apotheosis of the information economy.

Feel free to skip forward to the guts of the book, which gives detailed prescriptions on how to lead your organization and your own career within the living networks. However I think you’ll find it both interesting and useful to understand how and why the networks are coming to life.


The idea of humanity as a whole being considered as a living entity is by no means a new one. Some of the early proponents include the nineteenth century evolutionary biologist Herbert Spencer, who coined the phrase “survival of the fittest” before Darwin used it, and science fiction writer H.G. Wells, who wrote a book “World Brain” outlining his vision for human minds coming together as one. The revolutionary mystic Pierre Teilhard de Chardin brought into our language the word noösphere, which means the global domain of mind. Over the last decade the “global brain” movement has gained momentum, however primarily as a discussion between academics on the social implications of the birth of a higher-order entity.

The word “superorganism” means an organism that is itself composed of other organisms. Plants and animals are made up of many living cells, however those cells cannot survive on their own. In contrast, bee hives and ant colonies are prime examples of superorganisms. Each insect has an independent existence, but often can only survive as part of the larger societies of which they are part. The behaviors of bee swarms or ant colonies emerge at the level of those societies, and cannot be predicted from studying the individual insects.

The idea of a superorganism is that it can be considered as an integrated whole. It is clear that a multi-celled organism such as a tree or a cat is an integral whole—messages and responses flow through the entire organism in a coordinated fashion. However while an ant colony consists of many ants that are alive in their own right, it can be thought of as an entity because of the complex signaling that enables distribution of labor and coordinated actions. These signals can be considered to be the nervous system of the lifeform, whether they are within a single multi-celled organism, or between the individual living entities that make up a superorganism.

Our shared nervous system comes to life

There are curious parallels between the human brain and human society. The 100 billion or so neurons that make up the brain are deeply connected—each neuron can trigger approximately 1000 other neurons. By firing other neurons in turn, any two neurons in the brain are separated by no more than four or five steps. All of our thought and behavior stems from the interactions and mutual triggering of these billions of neurons. If we now look at human society, there is a reasonable level of correspondence. The world’s population is around 6 billion. The average person in the developed world knows around 300 other people. And any two people in the world are connected by no more than six steps.

Until recently it would have been ridiculous to extend this comparison, because each neuron in a human brain can trigger others in tiny fractions of a second in highly complex patterns. In contrast, since the dawn of time people around the world have been grouped in relatively small clusters called villages and cities, with extremely little and slow communication between those clusters, and in reality often within those clusters. When communication across states or nations—as recently as the 1980s—was mainly by mail and expensive telegrams and telephone calls, there was a tiny and very slow flow of information between people other than those in the same location.

If this is the nervous system of a living entity, it is one of an extremely slow-thinking and moving beast. Academics and thinkers around the world have always corresponded and shared ideas, but when these were by mail, literally on the slow boat, the sparks that flew were but dull glimmers. This is precisely why the networks are coming to life today. The emerging global communication networks are the new nervous system of humanity.

Over the centuries developing communication technologies such as bookprinting, telephone, and radio, have helped to connect people and allowed richer flows of information and ideas across the world. The digitization of communication media that has characterized the last two decades has brought consistent exponential growth in the power, speed, and breadth of communication capabilities. A massive blossoming in connectivity in the last five years, encompassing e-mail, the Internet, broadband, cell phones, and increasingly advanced human-machine interfaces has finally brought the depth and richness of connectivity between people and devices to a critical level. What were a set of individual minds with limited and sporadic communication between them are now connected so richly that we can indeed draw the analogy between a human brain and human society. Our connectivity is such that we are becoming as of one mind, a global superorganism.

The development of the infrastructure is the enabler—the global networks now have a nervous system. However the infrastructure itself is not the interesting part—it’s the signals and messages that travel through our shared nervous system that is the essence of our life. The brain of a human is quite similar to that of a dolphin or chimpanzee. And the brain of a genius is often indistinguishable from that of an idiot. Yes, we can now say that the global networks now have a shared nervous system in our communications infrastructure, however what will make this useful, what will create a true single superorganism, is the quality and richness of the information and ideas that flow through it. That is why the focus of this book is on the flow of information and ideas through the networks, how it is changing as the networks come alive, and the implications for business.


So what is life? A very good question that has been the subject of heated debate among biologists for centuries, with no signs of full agreement emerging. It’s one of those things that you recognize when you see it, but defies the ability to be defined. The many attempted definitions of life try to describe the characteristics of living things, without inadvertently encompassing things that aren’t alive. Because of the diversity of life and the wonder of the world we live in, it’s an incredibly difficult task. However scientists’ understanding of the nature of life has evolved considerably in the last decades. This helps us to understand how the global networks are coming to life.

Autopoiesis and living systems

In the early 1980s biologists Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela spawned a revolution in the way scientists think about life. They felt that there were fundamental problems in our current understanding of life, and proposed the new concept of autopoiesis, coining a word from the Greek to mean “self-producing”. They defined an autopoietic system as a network of processes that produces its own components in a feedback loop, and is distinct from its environment. Let’s unpack this to see how it works.

A self-producing system is one in which its components participate in the processes that produce those same components. In a cell, the nucleic acids provide its genetic code and are translated into proteins, that in turn create and recreate all the constituents of the cell, including another copy of the cell’s DNA if it divides. In a similar way, the components of a multi-celled organism such as a human are its cells, and the human body as a whole continually creates itself by growing the new appropriate cells as required. In both cases this is literally a process of self-creation—it is defined by a feedback loop in which the elements of the living system end up by creating themselves. And both cells and humans have distinct boundaries—while organisms take in energy and food from outside and excrete waste, the self-organization that enables them to continually recreate themselves happens entirely within the boundaries of their cell walls or outer skin.

With this new understanding of the nature of life, we can view the global networks with a fresh eye. The world of information and ideas in fact precisely matches the definition of autopoiesis: it produces its own components through a network of processes involving feedback loops. Information and ideas are generated in the minds of people and the circuits of computers. They do not come from nowhere—they are created from the raw material of other information and ideas that have been read, heard, or received as input.

A reporter for the New York Times writes an article on media spending by pharmaceutical companies. The article is based on input from research firms, other media, interviews, and in no small part the past experience, reading, and thinking of the reporter. The article in turn is read by reporters at the Times and other publications, some of whom mark it as a reference for future articles. The Times’ readers learn something, and a few who find the article particularly interesting mention the article or its ideas to others. Someone who is interviewed by another newspaper on a similar topic the following week doesn’t mention the article, but his views have been influenced by what he read.

Let’s see a few entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley get together over breakfast and bounce around some ideas on what’s hot in the technology market. One of them subsequently makes a presentation, incorporating some of the themes that the group chatted about. This sparks off someone in the audience, who instantly sees how one of the ideas can be modified to apply to the venture she’s starting, and she shifts her business model. Months later the same entrepreneurs have breakfast again and discuss the new start-up, totally unaware that they’ve contributed to the flow of ideas that helped form it.

Information and ideas beget information and ideas. They don’t spring from nothingness, but are based in turn on other information and ideas. This is the world we live in, in which information and ideas cycle through the system to create other information and ideas, ever faster, growing in a highly creative network of processes. This is exactly an autopoietic system. The world of information and ideas is, quite literally, alive. This living system encompasses all of the people and digital systems in the world; we are all integrated as one whole living system, bounded simply by the scope of our global civilization. The domain of this life is information and ideas, with people and digital systems forming the context in which this flow happens.

The eminent German sociologist Niklas Luhmann worked for two decades applying the concept of autopoiesis to social systems, and he too found that their central component is communication. A social system is made up of processes that recursively produce communication, which is the essence of a social system. It produces itself. And by means of the flow of information and ideas through our minds and digital systems, we all participate in a living system vastly greater than ourselves.


So what are the implications of the birth of the living networks? What does it mean for the organizations and individuals that are meshed into a lifeform far greater than themselves? Those are the issues we will explore throughout this book, seeking wherever possible to find practical approaches to the key business drivers we confront every day. How does it affect the way we manage people and processes in organizations? How should we develop valuable relationships inside and outside our organizations? What is the impact of intellectual property issues on our life within the networks? What organizational strategies will be successful? As individuals, how can we live richer and more fulfilling lives?

The first thing we must understand is that the living networks form a whole. There are no true boundaries within the living networks—the flow of information and ideas that is at their heart respects no artificial borders, be it across nations or organizations. Most managers think at the level of the organization, about their company and how it interacts with its environment. This is dangerous, almost delusional. We must think first on the level of the flows of information and ideas, the flows of value, the global nature of the networks that in which we participate. Only from that perspective can we understand how our firms can create and extract value by integrating and combining with these rich flows. The way we approach all of our business relationships, including working with customers and suppliers, outsourcing, alliances, and collaboration, determine the success of the organization.

Information and ideas—and the relationships through which they flow—are all that matter in the economy today. To take just one flow of value in the economy, whether you are mining and refining copper, transporting it around the world, building and selling products from copper, or trading copper futures in the financial markets, the effectiveness of your business decisions is based on the relevance, accuracy, and timeliness of the information you have, and the quality of the ideas you apply to your processes. The critical importance of information and ideas in the economy is by no means new. However it is now predominant.

The only truly sustainable competitive advantage in a world of free flow of information and ideas is the ability to create and implement valuable new ideas, in other words to innovate. However the dynamics of innovation are changing dramatically. As technology becomes increasingly advanced, and thus specialized, no organization can claim to have the full spectrum of expertise required to innovate. We have no choice but to collaborate in order to keep ahead. And this creates a whole minefield of intellectual property issues. The concept of the living networks gives us powerful insights on both how we create intellectual property and how we extract value from it.

The potential

Something fundamental has changed. The connectivity and integration that the current round of technologies affords us are resulting in a virtually discontinuous shift in our world. The human race is moving from consisting of billions of individual minds, to becoming an integral whole comprising both people and the digital technologies that connect and complement us. Our new shared nervous system means that we as individuals are becoming like the neurons of a single global brain, so richly connected that the whole vastly transcends its components.

The future of business is one in which individuals and organizations create value primarily by rich participation in the flow and birth of information and ideas. We will do this by integrating closely with other organizations, forming networks and communities within and across organizations, truly acting as participants in a global lifeflow.

The networks are still very young, blinking at the world around them. As individuals, we can rejoice in being part of a lifeform of a higher order than ourselves. And in the coming years and decades we can wonder as the living networks evolve many dimensions beyond their awakening form. This is our future.

  • Ross,
    Loving this concept, as I see this emerging as well. I have been slowly developing a similar idea as a means to more natural foresight-fit environments. ( Can’t wait to strengthen these ideas through the concepts you are presenting as well!
    Frank Spencer

  • Marco A.

    There’s a whole book about this topic that came out in 2001, Global Brain by Howard Bloom.

  • Thanks Frank, Marco.
    Yes there are a wide range of books and resources on the topic – best reference is at the Principia Cybernetica site

  • Autopoesis didn’t catch on for its author either, as mainstream biologists still can’t get behind the idea of symbiogenesis. Perhaps even the smartest among us don’t want to admit we are all conglomerates of life itself. As a metaphor for networks, it seems inappropriate because it is so much more complex than any network I’ve ever seen. As someone who believed emergence would be an interesting topic for study when the Internet began, I am seriously disappointed. I am convinced that until humans evolve far beyond where we are today, intellectually, we will continue to produce networks that disappoint and are impossible to secure.

  • Ross –
    Your have a fascinating thought process, and some well developed arguments.
    Frankly, I couldn’t argue with any of it.
    As ants are to ant colonies, so humans are to their communities. With increased levels of connectedness, those communities can grow richer, and the ‘living networks’ connecting them more robust. I have heard the human brain is vastly underutilized, possessing greater potential than we know how to tap. So too are the historical limitations of our uber community ‘civilization’ .. full of diverse insight and potential but too local and disconnected to accomplish much as a unit. Mere survival can often prove a challenge. But when its members begin to work together, sharing knowledge and insights, learning and adapting, the game is different.
    I like using the concept of ecosystem to describe the functioning of highly interdependent social networks, and have often referred to the next evolution of networked intellectual processing power as a knowledge renaissance.
    You may want to check the work that’s been done on EcoDNA. A few of us renegade neuron’s have built process models on what it would take to drive social innovation, with some progress here:
    Our paradigms are framed a bit differently (personally, I have yet to fully come to terms with a ‘global brain’, though with your article, I’m warming up to it) but our meta-framing seems to be built on the same foundation of complexity science, with a healthy dose of the practical – observing what is being done, and giving credence to what is possible.
    Much work remains to get this global network functioning at even a fraction of its potential. Most human neurons are reluctant to fire. In the context of the social vernacular, I call it lack of engagement.
    We’re definitely of like mind, Ross. Apparently, in more ways than one. Now I just need to track down your book.
    Looking forward to learning more.
    Chris (@SourcePOV)

  • Thanks Chris, very interesting.
    Yes there’s a wide range of people’s propensity to participate in the living networks – for me that’s what’s most enjoyable.
    Every chapter of Living Networks can be downloaded from here:

  • How funny. After finishing my blog post this morning on “Enterprise 2.0: Three Lessons from Biology 101” I decided it was time to clean up my open browser tabs, whereupon I discovered your recent post about autopoiesis.
    I was fortunate to attend a lecture by Maturana in the early 1980s, and remain convinced that he and his colleagues have discovered an important pattern. It made my day to see that we both saw its applicability to enterprise collaboration!

  • Very cool Michael.
    Back a decade ago Maturana and Varela were all the vogue as complexity science hit management, but they seem to have been largely forgotten again. Their work is still very relevant.

  • You will discover radiation improvements around peoples’ thoughts considering that the Fukushima nuclear power plant after a good surge, gucci clothing danger connected with death towards area residents get fled. By using plant topic around increased nuclear radiation, radioactive substance throughout meats solutions surpass, increased mineral water in the make a difference regarding nuclear radiation, much like the darkness associated with dread as the distribute connected with germs. Transformed by means of nuclear radiation, not just the particular environmental Fukushima, Fukushima in the individuals there. June 3, this specific reporter from Fukushima City, Fukushima nuclear power grow to begin walking in line completely far east. Straight into with regards to THIRTY kilometers in the Fukushima nuclear energy place, gucci outlet densely become ever more scarce, you will observe forgotten terrain. Many sometimes appears from time to time in the environmentally friendly grounds regarding fruit and vegetables waiting for picking, nonetheless looking forward, Yimapingchuan plant bed is not a amount.

    Fukushima nuclear electricity place in the more new, desolate ambiance much more in-depth bone marrow, skinny men and women find some good air. Fukushima nuclear electricity place THIRTY km from the particular Canal Wu Metropolis, many villages were deserted, gucci jewelry or anything else secured that front door. Avenue shops and places to eat are almost all shut down. A NEW media reporter has been pleasantly surprised the local people returning around to get journalists, even now follow any gas section personnel appeared to be very surprised. He reported of which before the earthquake below, an overall regarding 30 communities, more than twenty trillion folks live. The 3rd morning following a earthquake, gucci outlet online that villagers begun to progressively withdrew. Right up until weekly in the past, where Tokyo and various elements of radioactivity or more in comparison with EIGHT situations. Because of the kept are not able to take any nearby the dishes, normal water are unable to beverage, and perhaps breathe the air are also anxious. Many villagers are unable to carry the following thought torment, relations and also good friends proceed.

    Once a couple hours associated with trying, this reporter attended Fukushima nuclear energy place TWENTY kilometers off from that boundary brand in the limitations, which is, Fukushima, “no male’s area. ” Right here, the particular media reporter halted because of the sentinel with shield. That protections applied goggles warned reporters here is exclusively THIRTY km’s from your Fukushima nuclear electrical power grow plants, is a Government’s obtain in order to force the evacuation connected with subjects within the area, gucci online store absolutely no person will get into. Tokyo Electric powered Electricity Organization, reported by facts published in regards to the place connected with nuclear radiation in the A SINGLE. 36 micro-West / hours, more than 12 situations around Tokyo. One particular guard explained the fact that national boundaries protect 1 day a new folks, they will defend several shiftings, for you to forbid all people via stepping into. Gain access to Nuclear workforce therefore to their saving need to use clothes and also radiation compound products, and they also could only guard outside the house wearing goggles. At present, gucci men fashion shoes a couple from Fukushima nuclear power grow staff members tested maxed the particular radioactive fabric. . 

  • Realise this is a two year old post Ross and accessibly described. Wonder if you think the now 50th year old, oft quoted Marshall McLuhan concept or observation of the Global Village with it’s cascaded interconnectedness backbone lay the foundations for much of the single human organism thinking – or there were even earlier bio-anthropological studies turned metaphors used to describe our hyper connectivity…

    • The global brain is an old idea, with the ancient Greeks, Teilhard de Chardin, and H.G. Wells among those putting forward related ideas – here is a nice bibliography:

      I’m a big McLuhan fan but the global village concept is slightly different I think – the reference in the Wikipedia article is to a different point about extension of consciousness.

  • Given recent insights from contemporary science on the phenomenon of coherence, I wonder how this relates to and helps confirm the observations of hyper-connectivity you describe. It is now understood how liquid water is made up of networks of “coherence domains” — regions in which the molecules act in phase. This is called coherence. What is interesting and particularly significant for issues of hyper-connectivity is that when sets of coherence domains come into coherence among themselves, an emergent phenomenon known as “super-coherence” occurs. As it turns out, only dissipative systems — ones capable of exporting to their environment the energy that they produce — are capable of super-coherence. A system composed of super-coherent sub-systems is highly resonant. That is, it carries, sustains, and conveys patterns of health and wellbeing so long as it is not actively destabilized in it’s resonant milieu. When brought to the level of human social and societal systems, this phenomenon appears to manifest in ways you describe in terms of hyper-connectivity. Would you agree?