<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: User Filtered Content (UFC) is what Web 2.0 is about… and Digg is a UFC site	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rossdawson.com/user_filtered_c_1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rossdawson.com/user_filtered_c_1/</link>
	<description>Keynote speaker &#124; Futurist &#124; Strategy advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:27:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ross Dawson		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/user_filtered_c_1/#comment-276</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Dawson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=455#comment-276</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Lauren, it&#039;s aggregated rather than individual filtering: collective behaviors allow us to find what&#039;s interesting or useful.
My definition of Web 2.0 is: “Distributed technologies built to integrate, that collectively transform mass participation into valuable emergent outcomes.” - the key is in the mechanisms that transform that mass participation into something useful (such as user filtered content).
For more see our Web 2.0 framework: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/05/launching_the_w.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/05/launching_the_w.html&lt;/a&gt;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lauren, it&#8217;s aggregated rather than individual filtering: collective behaviors allow us to find what&#8217;s interesting or useful.<br />
My definition of Web 2.0 is: “Distributed technologies built to integrate, that collectively transform mass participation into valuable emergent outcomes.” &#8211; the key is in the mechanisms that transform that mass participation into something useful (such as user filtered content).<br />
For more see our Web 2.0 framework: <a href="https://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/05/launching_the_w.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/05/launching_the_w.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lauren Cooney		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/user_filtered_c_1/#comment-275</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren Cooney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=455#comment-275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Ross,
So if I self-select a widget or series of widgets to use on my blog, would that be a form of &quot;user filtered content&quot; or is it based on the audience selection rather than the individual user?
Lauren
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ross,<br />
So if I self-select a widget or series of widgets to use on my blog, would that be a form of &#8220;user filtered content&#8221; or is it based on the audience selection rather than the individual user?<br />
Lauren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ross Dawson		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/user_filtered_c_1/#comment-274</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Dawson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=455#comment-274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting point Nic. If these are Digg&#039;s moderators whose activities are not transparent then it&#039;s not UFC, which is about mechanisms to enable all participants to collectively filter. This doesn&#039;t have to be entirely democratic in the sense of one vote per user - on Slashdot some people through their contribution have more sway.
Of course there&#039;s nothing sacrosanct about UFC - there&#039;s nothing wrong with filtering in other ways if it gives useful outcomes. But if you&#039;re pretending it&#039;s pure UFC and it&#039;s not, that&#039;s a different matter...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point Nic. If these are Digg&#8217;s moderators whose activities are not transparent then it&#8217;s not UFC, which is about mechanisms to enable all participants to collectively filter. This doesn&#8217;t have to be entirely democratic in the sense of one vote per user &#8211; on Slashdot some people through their contribution have more sway.<br />
Of course there&#8217;s nothing sacrosanct about UFC &#8211; there&#8217;s nothing wrong with filtering in other ways if it gives useful outcomes. But if you&#8217;re pretending it&#8217;s pure UFC and it&#8217;s not, that&#8217;s a different matter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nic Hodges		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/user_filtered_c_1/#comment-273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nic Hodges]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=455#comment-273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting that you should post this at the same time the issue of Digg using moderators is brough up by Duncan Riley and Valleywag ( &lt;a href=&quot;https://valleywag.com/346263/diggs-secret-editors&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://valleywag.com/346263/diggs-secret-editors&lt;/a&gt; )
I guess the question then is (if the reports of moderators are true), does the use of moderators help filter UFC or does it completely contradict the idea of it?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that you should post this at the same time the issue of Digg using moderators is brough up by Duncan Riley and Valleywag ( <a href="https://valleywag.com/346263/diggs-secret-editors" rel="nofollow">https://valleywag.com/346263/diggs-secret-editors</a> )<br />
I guess the question then is (if the reports of moderators are true), does the use of moderators help filter UFC or does it completely contradict the idea of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ross Dawson		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/user_filtered_c_1/#comment-272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Dawson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=455#comment-272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks John - yes it&#039;s a great example.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks John &#8211; yes it&#8217;s a great example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Jones		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/user_filtered_c_1/#comment-271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=455#comment-271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[have you seen this?
&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.readburner.com/stats.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://www.readburner.com/stats.php&lt;/a&gt;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have you seen this?<br />
<a href="https://www.readburner.com/stats.php" rel="nofollow">https://www.readburner.com/stats.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
