<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Social networks in organizations: balancing risk, reward, and transparency	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rossdawson.com/social_networks_3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rossdawson.com/social_networks_3/</link>
	<description>Keynote speaker &#124; Futurist &#124; Strategy advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ross Dawson		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/social_networks_3/#comment-332</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Dawson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=520#comment-332</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nathanael, I may have missed something, but as far as I can see the government Stay Smart Online &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.staysmartonline.gov.au/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://www.staysmartonline.gov.au/&lt;/a&gt; guidelines are pretty balanced - they certainly don&#039;t say don&#039;t use social networks. I think that the broadest possible awareness of online risks in fact makes uptake likely to be faster. The reality is that there are a variety of risks in doing just about anything online, and concerns such as identify theft are real. Better that people understand this, so there are fewer problems. I agree that the benefits of social networks should be up-played, but then again most people can work it out for themselves, I&#039;d hope :-)
In a similar vein, I was rather surprised to see that the mailer that Howard sent to every Australian household about e-security a year or two ago was actually very balanced, and wasn&#039;t scaremongering. As such, it probably was positive in helping uptake.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathanael, I may have missed something, but as far as I can see the government Stay Smart Online <a href="https://www.staysmartonline.gov.au/" rel="nofollow">https://www.staysmartonline.gov.au/</a> guidelines are pretty balanced &#8211; they certainly don&#8217;t say don&#8217;t use social networks. I think that the broadest possible awareness of online risks in fact makes uptake likely to be faster. The reality is that there are a variety of risks in doing just about anything online, and concerns such as identify theft are real. Better that people understand this, so there are fewer problems. I agree that the benefits of social networks should be up-played, but then again most people can work it out for themselves, I&#8217;d hope :-)<br />
In a similar vein, I was rather surprised to see that the mailer that Howard sent to every Australian household about e-security a year or two ago was actually very balanced, and wasn&#8217;t scaremongering. As such, it probably was positive in helping uptake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NathanaelB		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/social_networks_3/#comment-331</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NathanaelB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 06:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=520#comment-331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sounds like you would share my disappointment in Senator Conroy&#039;s comments today (launching National E-Security Awareness Week) about the security of social networking sites ... specifically mentioning LinkedIn amongst others and the risks of phishing scams. Yes there are security risks - but why not a single mention of the huge benefits of adopting new technology such as social networking. It was made out to sound like it&#039;s a massive risk to put personal information online out in the open and engage in online interaction. Very disappointing.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like you would share my disappointment in Senator Conroy&#8217;s comments today (launching National E-Security Awareness Week) about the security of social networking sites &#8230; specifically mentioning LinkedIn amongst others and the risks of phishing scams. Yes there are security risks &#8211; but why not a single mention of the huge benefits of adopting new technology such as social networking. It was made out to sound like it&#8217;s a massive risk to put personal information online out in the open and engage in online interaction. Very disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
