<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Professional services network offsite: Tapping the Power of Collaboration	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rossdawson.com/professional_se_1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rossdawson.com/professional_se_1/</link>
	<description>Keynote speaker &#124; Futurist &#124; Strategy advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 04:06:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John Maloney		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/professional_se_1/#comment-214</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Maloney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 07:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=392#comment-214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi --
Good remarks and comments.
There is real barrier to adoption that needs to be overcome -- process orientation.
When large expert services orgs are faced with problems, they turn to 20th process archtypes and the methods and tools BPR, 6-Sigma, TQM, etc. There is administrative utility service BPR, but for a complex system like consulting, they are counterproductive.
SNA provides only a fractional improvement by mapping relationships.
Value networks and analysis provides the complete framework including the mechanical, ordered-systems of process engineering and the advantages of the critical network archetypes. Here is where if fits for collaboration.
&lt;a href=&quot;https://kmblogs.com/public/item/180325&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://kmblogs.com/public/item/180325&lt;/a&gt;
-j
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8212;<br />
Good remarks and comments.<br />
There is real barrier to adoption that needs to be overcome &#8212; process orientation.<br />
When large expert services orgs are faced with problems, they turn to 20th process archtypes and the methods and tools BPR, 6-Sigma, TQM, etc. There is administrative utility service BPR, but for a complex system like consulting, they are counterproductive.<br />
SNA provides only a fractional improvement by mapping relationships.<br />
Value networks and analysis provides the complete framework including the mechanical, ordered-systems of process engineering and the advantages of the critical network archetypes. Here is where if fits for collaboration.<br />
<a href="https://kmblogs.com/public/item/180325" rel="nofollow">https://kmblogs.com/public/item/180325</a><br />
-j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kate Carruthers		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/professional_se_1/#comment-213</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate Carruthers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=392#comment-213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We have known intuitively for a long time about the power of networks.  However, until very recently it has been hard to harness the power of these networks.  It is interesting the see the mainstream freaking out about new ways of communication, e.g. Facebook.  I think the maturity in collaboration technologies will begin to enable &amp; drive this kind of collorative network now.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have known intuitively for a long time about the power of networks.  However, until very recently it has been hard to harness the power of these networks.  It is interesting the see the mainstream freaking out about new ways of communication, e.g. Facebook.  I think the maturity in collaboration technologies will begin to enable &#038; drive this kind of collorative network now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
