<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Prediction: Video-conferencing will help drive increased business travel	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rossdawson.com/prediction-video-conferencing-will-help-drive-increased-business-travel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rossdawson.com/prediction-video-conferencing-will-help-drive-increased-business-travel/</link>
	<description>Keynote speaker &#124; Futurist &#124; Strategy advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 03:41:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lincoln De Kalb		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/prediction-video-conferencing-will-help-drive-increased-business-travel/#comment-3886</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lincoln De Kalb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rossdawson.com/?p=5441#comment-3886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[100% agree Ross that VC is no substitute for face-to-face. Notwithstanding your comment re pheromes, I wonder if technology like body size screens (life sized full body images) would change that. I know that regular video conferences, particularly the usual webcam style, dont allow you see what they are doing with the hands or feet for instance. Telepresence system&#039;s help however they certainly aren&#039;t the norm due to cost, would you prediction hold true(er) if telepresence became more ubiquitous  Would fully immersive goggle like screen&#039;s change that. Time will tell but agree that for the time being they both have their place.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% agree Ross that VC is no substitute for face-to-face. Notwithstanding your comment re pheromes, I wonder if technology like body size screens (life sized full body images) would change that. I know that regular video conferences, particularly the usual webcam style, dont allow you see what they are doing with the hands or feet for instance. Telepresence system&#8217;s help however they certainly aren&#8217;t the norm due to cost, would you prediction hold true(er) if telepresence became more ubiquitous  Would fully immersive goggle like screen&#8217;s change that. Time will tell but agree that for the time being they both have their place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
