<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New ventures in political crowdsourcing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rossdawson.com/new_ventures_in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rossdawson.com/new_ventures_in/</link>
	<description>Keynote speaker &#124; Futurist &#124; Strategy advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Political Scrapbook		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/new_ventures_in/#comment-1163</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Political Scrapbook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=948#comment-1163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the link! This got me thinking...
1: The Guardian&#039;s expenses system has a similar objective but is much, much better &lt;a href=&quot;https://mps-expenses.guardian.co.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://mps-expenses.guardian.co.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://mps-expenses.guardian.co.uk/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
2: The Conservative Treasury team will already be crowd-sourcing, in a narrower sense, from their network of associates, friends, think tanks, pressure groups etc.
3: What kills this dead, IMHO, is the total lack of feedback. There&#039;s no opportunity for user interaction or to see what has happened with your information. It&#039;s basically a black hole.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link! This got me thinking&#8230;<br />
1: The Guardian&#8217;s expenses system has a similar objective but is much, much better <a href="https://mps-expenses.guardian.co.uk/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="https://mps-expenses.guardian.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">https://mps-expenses.guardian.co.uk/</a><br />
2: The Conservative Treasury team will already be crowd-sourcing, in a narrower sense, from their network of associates, friends, think tanks, pressure groups etc.<br />
3: What kills this dead, IMHO, is the total lack of feedback. There&#8217;s no opportunity for user interaction or to see what has happened with your information. It&#8217;s basically a black hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
