<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Is the trend to openness accelerating? Social networks as an inflection point	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rossdawson.com/is_the_trend_to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rossdawson.com/is_the_trend_to/</link>
	<description>Keynote speaker &#124; Futurist &#124; Strategy advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 04:42:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: NakedBiff		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/is_the_trend_to/#comment-191</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NakedBiff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 04:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=350#comment-191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p /&gt;Absolutely. We are, at the moment, within a significant shift in the way people use the internet...it feels like this discussion is the prelude to the prelude of what might one day be called web 3.0.
&lt;p /&gt;Ross, you&#039;re right when you say that what is happening in social networking is a fantastic case study relevant to all business segments. The reason for this is that it is about online relationships becoming more like offline relationships - in the same way that Cluetrain was about making business human!
&lt;p /&gt;If you have time, I&#039;d love to hear your thoughts on Open Messaging (something that we&#039;re talking/writing about and developing all at the same time) at &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nakedyak.com/?cat=15.&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://www.nakedyak.com/?cat=15.&lt;/a&gt;
Take it easy
~biff~
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Absolutely. We are, at the moment, within a significant shift in the way people use the internet&#8230;it feels like this discussion is the prelude to the prelude of what might one day be called web 3.0.</p>
<p>Ross, you&#8217;re right when you say that what is happening in social networking is a fantastic case study relevant to all business segments. The reason for this is that it is about online relationships becoming more like offline relationships &#8211; in the same way that Cluetrain was about making business human!</p>
<p>If you have time, I&#8217;d love to hear your thoughts on Open Messaging (something that we&#8217;re talking/writing about and developing all at the same time) at <a href="https://www.nakedyak.com/?cat=15." rel="nofollow"></a><a href="https://www.nakedyak.com/?cat=15" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.nakedyak.com/?cat=15</a>.<br />
Take it easy<br />
~biff~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Noble		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/is_the_trend_to/#comment-190</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Noble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=350#comment-190</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Couldn&#039;t agree more. Look how LinkedIn followed after Facebook published an API. Now if one of them, in turn, publishes an &lt;i&gt;open&lt;/i&gt; API, Facebook will face competitive pressure to do the same. And so on, and so on.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It could still take a while, however. After all, we don&#039;t yet have universal interoperability for IM.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Nonetheless, the endgame is clear. In the future, the phrase &quot;social networks&quot; will mean what it meant before Friendster -- the connections you make with people you know. The tools that allow you to do this will not be the network; they&#039;ll be  interoperable conduits, like those that are provided by telcos today.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more. Look how LinkedIn followed after Facebook published an API. Now if one of them, in turn, publishes an <i>open</i> API, Facebook will face competitive pressure to do the same. And so on, and so on.</p>
<p>It could still take a while, however. After all, we don&#8217;t yet have universal interoperability for IM.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, the endgame is clear. In the future, the phrase &#8220;social networks&#8221; will mean what it meant before Friendster &#8212; the connections you make with people you know. The tools that allow you to do this will not be the network; they&#8217;ll be  interoperable conduits, like those that are provided by telcos today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anshu Sharma		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/is_the_trend_to/#comment-189</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anshu Sharma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 11:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=350#comment-189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ross,
I agree with you that Facebook may internalize some of this and make changes but I think it is much more likely that they would have to be disrupted into doing this - even if its by an upstart rather than a  behemoth.
Keep writing!
-Anshu
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross,<br />
I agree with you that Facebook may internalize some of this and make changes but I think it is much more likely that they would have to be disrupted into doing this &#8211; even if its by an upstart rather than a  behemoth.<br />
Keep writing!<br />
-Anshu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
