<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Insights into the Australian search and directories market	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rossdawson.com/insights_into_t/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rossdawson.com/insights_into_t/</link>
	<description>Keynote speaker &#124; Futurist &#124; Strategy advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 03:42:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ross Dawson		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/insights_into_t/#comment-322</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Dawson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 03:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=515#comment-322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Vishal, I&#039;m far more interested in how new participants can take market share from Sensis than how the dominant player can continue to take the value (unless I&#039;m offered a lucrative consulting contract! :)).
I think one particularly useful strategy is building communities in specific local search domains e.g. plumbing, dentistry, auto mechanics, natural health etc. Everybody wants good recommendations for these kinds of suppliers, and the best way to get this critical mass of participation is to be focused. For example I think raveaboutit.com.au is conceptually good in providing peer reviews for local suppliers, with lots of associated business models. However because it has hundreds of categories, it is likely that in fact none of them get traction. Multi-niche can be combined later into something bigger, but it&#039;s tough the other way around...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vishal, I&#8217;m far more interested in how new participants can take market share from Sensis than how the dominant player can continue to take the value (unless I&#8217;m offered a lucrative consulting contract! :)).<br />
I think one particularly useful strategy is building communities in specific local search domains e.g. plumbing, dentistry, auto mechanics, natural health etc. Everybody wants good recommendations for these kinds of suppliers, and the best way to get this critical mass of participation is to be focused. For example I think raveaboutit.com.au is conceptually good in providing peer reviews for local suppliers, with lots of associated business models. However because it has hundreds of categories, it is likely that in fact none of them get traction. Multi-niche can be combined later into something bigger, but it&#8217;s tough the other way around&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vishal		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/insights_into_t/#comment-321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vishal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=515#comment-321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ross what will be interesting to know and esp yr thoughts on the analysis for Sensis. What do you think how they can prepare for the future.
I have suggested some basic steps at this stage, but more in future.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross what will be interesting to know and esp yr thoughts on the analysis for Sensis. What do you think how they can prepare for the future.<br />
I have suggested some basic steps at this stage, but more in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
