<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Global and regional business models for blogging: Allure licenses Gawker titles	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rossdawson.com/global_and_regi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rossdawson.com/global_and_regi/</link>
	<description>Keynote speaker &#124; Futurist &#124; Strategy advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:41:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: iluvmeida		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/global_and_regi/#comment-202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iluvmeida]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=383#comment-202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think there is huge potential here. Its interesting looking at UGC (cost) models out there. There&#039;s the model where people create content and submit it in hope that the wider audience provides feedback, then there&#039;s the model where people submit and know they&#039;re getting good editorial feedback. It&#039;s been commented that the former is cost effective, however if you&#039;re a branded product, the money spent in paying people to sit and review submitted material (which I think will grow over time as this area is relatively unregulated)is already prohibitive. Why not put those monies into full-time editorial where users know they&#039;ll get a response and where editorial will also be able regulate immediately instead of having to deal with it through the courts? Bogs are a no-brainer.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is huge potential here. Its interesting looking at UGC (cost) models out there. There&#8217;s the model where people create content and submit it in hope that the wider audience provides feedback, then there&#8217;s the model where people submit and know they&#8217;re getting good editorial feedback. It&#8217;s been commented that the former is cost effective, however if you&#8217;re a branded product, the money spent in paying people to sit and review submitted material (which I think will grow over time as this area is relatively unregulated)is already prohibitive. Why not put those monies into full-time editorial where users know they&#8217;ll get a response and where editorial will also be able regulate immediately instead of having to deal with it through the courts? Bogs are a no-brainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
