<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Do social network technologies make us better or worse off as a society?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rossdawson.com/do_social_netwo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rossdawson.com/do_social_netwo/</link>
	<description>Keynote speaker &#124; Futurist &#124; Strategy advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruce Lewin		</title>
		<link>https://rossdawson.com/do_social_netwo/#comment-291</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Lewin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rd.wpram.com/?p=492#comment-291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Better off is one way of looking at it, but I think there is also something that runs in parallel to social network technologies...
In general, I think that much of the social network technologies tend to speed things up in terms of raising awareness, building (and dismantling!) relationships and generally getting closer to what an economist might call &#039;perfect information&#039;.
The fact that people are &#039;satisfycing&#039; and are not &#039;perfectly rational&#039; is perhaps best left for another time ;-)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better off is one way of looking at it, but I think there is also something that runs in parallel to social network technologies&#8230;<br />
In general, I think that much of the social network technologies tend to speed things up in terms of raising awareness, building (and dismantling!) relationships and generally getting closer to what an economist might call &#8216;perfect information&#8217;.<br />
The fact that people are &#8216;satisfycing&#8217; and are not &#8216;perfectly rational&#8217; is perhaps best left for another time ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
